-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does autocomplete attribute need appropriate type
?
#1562
Comments
As discussed on the call, the CG agrees with the suggestion. |
Results for
|
This is a continuation of the conversation we had on whether or not the
autocomplete
attribute value needs to be used with a specifictype
attribute value (as per the HTML spec)? The question is raised in the context of sc 1.3.5 Identify input purpose.This issue is closely related to #1541 and I don't think we can submit
autocomplete
attribute has valid value for a review until we resolve it.I've created two [test pages for the
autocomplete
attribute]. One forautocomplete
with a correct control group and one forautocomplete
with an incorrect control group. The findings are:bday-month
andusername
regardless of thetype
;username
regardless of thetype
and does not provide any suggestions forbday-month
In summary, it looks like the browsers do not care about the
type
and do not provide suggestions/ autocompletion for allautocomplete
attribute values.The situation is slightly complicated given that sc 1.3.5 does not require autocompletion but for the property to be programmatically identifiable. If the rule was purely about autocompletion then I'm sure we should stick with the spec but because using
autocomplete
for 1.3.5 has somewhat become a secondary purpose of theautocomplete
, I'm not so sure the rule should be so strict on the correcttype
attribute part, especially given that browsers do not seem to care.It would be good to have a discussion about this during the next call.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: