-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the SCIO Pipeline Mechanism for Importers/Improvers #1509
Comments
@keshav-space do you have any commit for this yet? |
@pombredanne here is WIP PR #1533 |
This was referenced Aug 7, 2024
aboutcode.pipeline 0.1 published to PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/aboutcode.pipeline/ |
This was referenced Aug 28, 2024
This was referenced Sep 3, 2024
This was referenced Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We should adopt/reuse the pipeline mechanism in SCIO for Importers and Improvers.
With this, we would have a common programming model across tools, including ScanCode.io and PurlDB
See also:
Migrate the improvers to aboutcode.pipeline:
merge this as a step in new importer pipeline
import_new_advisories
step inVulnerableCodeBaseImporterPipeline
.Migrate the importers to aboutcode.pipeline:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: