-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disassembler: RV32E
/ RV64E
Support
#21
Open
a4lg
wants to merge
1
commit into
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
Choose a base branch
from
riscv-dis-rv32e
base: riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 13, 2022 04:07
1e961d6
to
5e0bf59
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 13, 2022 06:46
5e0bf59
to
3a48888
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
4 times, most recently
from
July 13, 2022 07:23
14ca73d
to
4a88860
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 13, 2022 09:10
df97f33
to
fee50a9
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 13, 2022 10:25
fee50a9
to
43646db
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 13, 2022 11:21
43646db
to
c306598
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 13, 2022 11:28
afb7c60
to
82eaea0
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 13, 2022 11:28
c306598
to
3d14647
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 14, 2022 19:22
3d14647
to
15cb95f
Compare
a4lg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2022
…matching When building gdb with -fsanitize-threads and running test-case gdb.ada/char_enum_unicode.exp, I run into: ... WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=21301)^M Write of size 8 at 0x7b2000008080 by main thread:^M #0 free <null> (libtsan.so.2+0x4c5e2)^M #1 _dl_close_worker <null> (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x4b7b)^M #2 convert_between_encodings() charset.c:584^M ... #21 cooked_index_functions::expand_symtabs_matching() read.c:18606 ... This is fixed by making cooked_index_functions::expand_symtabs_matching wait for the cooked index finalization to be done. Tested on x86_64-linux. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29311 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 16, 2022 08:23
874e236
to
c86ec28
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 16, 2022 08:34
3cde0b4
to
8fbe8de
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 20, 2022 05:01
12112e9
to
29a7421
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 20, 2022 06:22
29a7421
to
7ad0299
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opts-minor-1
branch
from
July 20, 2022 10:31
7ad0299
to
fd73149
Compare
a4lg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2023
…g_types} With gdb build with -fsanitize=thread, and the exec from test-case gdb.base/index-cache.exp, I run into: ... $ rm -f ~/.cache/gdb/*; \ gdb -q -batch -iex "set index-cache enabled on" index-cache \ -ex "print foobar" ... WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=25018) Write of size 1 at 0x7b200000410d by main thread: #0 dw2_get_file_names_reader gdb/dwarf2/read.c:2033 (gdb+0x7ab023) #1 dw2_get_file_names gdb/dwarf2/read.c:2130 (gdb+0x7ab023) #2 dw_expand_symtabs_matching_file_matcher(dwarf2_per_objfile*, gdb::function_view<bool (char const*, bool)>) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:3105 (gdb+0x7ac6e9) #3 cooked_index_functions::expand_symtabs_matching(objfile*, gdb::function_view<bool (char const*, bool)>, lookup_name_info const*, gdb::function_view<bool (char const*)>, gdb::function_view<bool (compunit_symtab*)>, enum_flags<block_search_flag_values>, domain_enum, search_domain) gdb/dwarf2/read.c:16812 (gdb+0x7d040f) #4 objfile::map_symtabs_matching_filename(char const*, char const*, gdb::function_view<bool (symtab*)>) gdb/symfile-debug.c:219 (gdb+0xda5b6e) #5 iterate_over_symtabs(char const*, gdb::function_view<bool (symtab*)>) gdb/symtab.c:648 (gdb+0xdc441d) #6 lookup_symtab(char const*) gdb/symtab.c:662 (gdb+0xdc4522) #7 classify_name gdb/c-exp.y:3083 (gdb+0x61afec) #8 c_yylex gdb/c-exp.y:3251 (gdb+0x61dd13) #9 c_yyparse() build/gdb/c-exp.c.tmp:1988 (gdb+0x61f07e) #10 c_parse(parser_state*) gdb/c-exp.y:3417 (gdb+0x62d864) #11 language_defn::parser(parser_state*) const gdb/language.c:598 (gdb+0x977245) #12 parse_exp_in_context gdb/parse.c:414 (gdb+0xb10b1b) #13 parse_expression(char const*, innermost_block_tracker*, enum_flags<parser_flag>) gdb/parse.c:462 (gdb+0xb1112e) #14 process_print_command_args gdb/printcmd.c:1321 (gdb+0xb4bf8c) #15 print_command_1 gdb/printcmd.c:1335 (gdb+0xb4caaa) #16 print_command gdb/printcmd.c:1468 (gdb+0xb4cdda) #17 do_simple_func gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:95 (gdb+0x65b078) #18 cmd_func(cmd_list_element*, char const*, int) gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:2735 (gdb+0x65ed53) #19 execute_command(char const*, int) gdb/top.c:575 (gdb+0xe3a7ea) #20 catch_command_errors gdb/main.c:518 (gdb+0xa183fd) #21 execute_cmdargs gdb/main.c:617 (gdb+0xa185bf) #22 captured_main_1 gdb/main.c:1289 (gdb+0xa1aad8) #23 captured_main gdb/main.c:1310 (gdb+0xa1b9da) #24 gdb_main(captured_main_args*) gdb/main.c:1339 (gdb+0xa1b9da) #25 main gdb/gdb.c:39 (gdb+0x42506a) Previous read of size 1 at 0x7b200000410d by thread T2: #0 write_gdbindex gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c:1214 (gdb+0x75bb30) #1 write_dwarf_index(dwarf2_per_bfd*, char const*, char const*, char const*, dw_index_kind) gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c:1469 (gdb+0x75f803) #2 index_cache::store(dwarf2_per_bfd*, index_cache_store_context const&) gdb/dwarf2/index-cache.c:173 (gdb+0x755a36) #3 cooked_index::maybe_write_index(dwarf2_per_bfd*, index_cache_store_context const&) gdb/dwarf2/cooked-index.c:642 (gdb+0x71c96d) #4 operator() gdb/dwarf2/cooked-index.c:471 (gdb+0x71c96d) #5 _M_invoke /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:316 (gdb+0x71c96d) #6 std::function<void ()>::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706 (gdb+0x72a57c) #7 void std::__invoke_impl<void, std::function<void ()>&>(std::__invoke_other, std::function<void ()>&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:60 (gdb+0x72a5db) #8 std::__invoke_result<std::function<void ()>&>::type std::__invoke<std::function<void ()>&>(std::function<void ()>&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:95 (gdb+0x72a5db) #9 std::__future_base::_Task_state<std::function<void ()>, std::allocator<int>, void ()>::_M_run()::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/future:1421 (gdb+0x72a5db) #10 std::__future_base::_Task_setter<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result<void>, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter>, std::__future_base::_Task_state<std::function<void ()>, std::allocator<int>, void ()>::_M_run()::{lambda()#1}, void>::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/future:1362 (gdb+0x72a5db) #11 std::_Function_handler<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> (), std::__future_base::_Task_setter<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result<void>, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter>, std::__future_base::_Task_state<std::function<void ()>, std::allocator<int>, void ()>::_M_run()::{lambda()#1}, void> >::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:302 (gdb+0x72a5db) #12 std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706 (gdb+0x724954) #13 std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::_M_do_set(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*) /usr/include/c++/7/future:561 (gdb+0x724954) #14 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(std::__invoke_memfun_deref, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:73 (gdb+0x72434a) #15 std::__invoke_result<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>::type std::__invoke<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:95 (gdb+0x72434a) #16 std::call_once<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(std::once_flag&, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/mutex:672 (gdb+0x72434a) #17 std::call_once<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(std::once_flag&, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&)::{lambda()#2}::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/7/mutex:677 (gdb+0x72434a) #18 std::call_once<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(std::once_flag&, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&)::{lambda()#2}::_FUN() /usr/include/c++/7/mutex:677 (gdb+0x72434a) #19 pthread_once <null> (libtsan.so.0+0x4457c) #20 __gthread_once /usr/include/c++/7/x86_64-suse-linux/bits/gthr-default.h:699 (gdb+0x72532b) #21 void std::call_once<void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*>(std::once_flag&, void (std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::*&&)(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2*&&, std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*&&, bool*&&) /usr/include/c++/7/mutex:684 (gdb+0x72532b) #22 std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::_M_set_result(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>, bool) /usr/include/c++/7/future:401 (gdb+0x174570d) #23 std::__future_base::_Task_state<std::function<void ()>, std::allocator<int>, void ()>::_M_run() /usr/include/c++/7/future:1423 (gdb+0x174570d) #24 std::packaged_task<void ()>::operator()() /usr/include/c++/7/future:1556 (gdb+0x174570d) #25 gdb::thread_pool::thread_function() gdbsupport/thread-pool.cc:242 (gdb+0x174570d) #26 void std::__invoke_impl<void, void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*>(std::__invoke_memfun_deref, void (gdb::thread_pool::*&&)(), gdb::thread_pool*&&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:73 (gdb+0x17480c0) #27 std::__invoke_result<void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*>::type std::__invoke<void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*>(void (gdb::thread_pool::*&&)(), gdb::thread_pool*&&) /usr/include/c++/7/bits/invoke.h:95 (gdb+0x17480c0) #28 decltype (__invoke((_S_declval<0ul>)(), (_S_declval<1ul>)())) std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*> >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul>(std::_Index_tuple<0ul, 1ul>) /usr/include/c++/7/thread:234 (gdb+0x17480c0) #29 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*> >::operator()() /usr/include/c++/7/thread:243 (gdb+0x17480c0) #30 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (gdb::thread_pool::*)(), gdb::thread_pool*> > >::_M_run() /usr/include/c++/7/thread:186 (gdb+0x17480c0) #31 <null> <null> (libstdc++.so.6+0xdcac2) ... SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race gdb/dwarf2/read.c:2033 in dw2_get_file_names_reader ... The race happens when issuing the "file $exec" command. The race is between: - a worker thread writing the index cache, and in the process reading dwarf2_per_cu_data::is_debug_type, and - the main thread writing to dwarf2_per_cu_data::files_read. The two bitfields dwarf2_per_cu_data::files_read and dwarf2_per_cu_data::is_debug_type share the same bitfield container. Fix this by making dwarf2_per_cu_data::files_read a packed<bool, 1>. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR symtab/30718 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30718
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
August 7, 2023 02:55
1ad9136
to
899020c
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
August 8, 2023 03:19
899020c
to
cbd4e63
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 8, 2023 04:11
b3e9c64
to
4731f24
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
August 11, 2023 01:53
44387b5
to
ce839d4
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
August 11, 2023 03:56
ce839d4
to
58f4e93
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 15, 2023 06:37
3ae091d
to
4e94a65
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 15, 2023 07:27
612847a
to
7d54ac5
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
September 3, 2023 02:26
7d54ac5
to
43c246b
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
from
September 3, 2023 02:26
561da9e
to
12bd180
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
September 3, 2023 02:41
43c246b
to
da19323
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
from
September 3, 2023 02:42
12bd180
to
1ce95fd
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
September 5, 2023 07:58
da19323
to
fe6fd92
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
from
September 5, 2023 07:58
1ce95fd
to
6a63984
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
September 7, 2023 09:35
fe6fd92
to
a170be4
Compare
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-rv32e
branch
from
September 7, 2023 09:35
6a63984
to
9963fea
Compare
a4lg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2023
It was pointed out on the mailing list that a recently added test (gdb.python/py-progspace-events.exp) was failing when run with the native-extended-gdbserver board. This test was added with this commit: commit 59912fb Date: Tue Sep 19 11:45:36 2023 +0100 gdb: add Python events for program space addition and removal It turns out though that the test is failing due to a existing bug in GDB, the new test just exposes the problem. Additionally, the failure really doesn't even rely on the new functionality added in the above commit. I reduced the test to a simple set of steps that reproduced the failure and tested against GDB 13, and the test passes; so the bug was introduced since then. In fact, the bug was introduced with this commit: commit a282736 Date: Fri Sep 8 15:48:16 2023 +0100 gdb: remove final user of the executable_changed observer This commit changed how the per-inferior auxv data cache is managed, specifically, when the cache is cleared, and it is this that leads to the failure. This bug is interesting because it exposes a number of issues with GDB, I'll explain all of the problems I see, though ultimately, I only propose fixing one problem in this commit, which is enough to resolve the crash we are currently seeing. The crash that we are seeing manifests like this: ... [Inferior 2 (process 3970384) exited normally] +inferior 1 [Switching to inferior 1 [process 3970383] (/tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.python/py-progspace-events/py-progspace-events)] [Switching to thread 1.1 (Thread 3970383.3970383)] #0 breakpt () at /tmp/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-progspace-events.c:28 28 { /* Nothing. */ } (gdb) step +step terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gdb_exception_error' Fatal signal: Aborted ... etc ... What's happening is that GDB attempts to refill the auxv cache as a result of the gdbarch_has_shared_address_space call in program_space::~program_space, the backtrace looks like this: #0 0x00007fb4f419a9a5 in raise () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00000000008b635d in handle_fatal_signal (sig=6) at ../../src/gdb/event-top.c:912 #2 <signal handler called> #3 0x00007fb4f38e3625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #4 0x00007fb4f38cc8d9 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #5 0x00007fb4f3c70756 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() [clone .cold] () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #6 0x00007fb4f3c7c6dc in __cxxabiv1::__terminate(void (*)()) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #7 0x00007fb4f3c7b6e9 in __cxa_call_terminate () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #8 0x00007fb4f3c7c094 in __gxx_personality_v0 () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #9 0x00007fb4f3a80c63 in _Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2 () from /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 #10 0x00007fb4f3a8154e in _Unwind_Resume () from /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 #11 0x0000000000e8832d in target_read_alloc_1<unsigned char> (ops=0x408a3a0, object=TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV, annex=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2266 #12 0x0000000000e73dea in target_read_alloc (ops=0x408a3a0, object=TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV, annex=0x0) at ../../src/gdb/target.c:2315 #13 0x000000000058248c in target_read_auxv_raw (ops=0x408a3a0) at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:379 #14 0x000000000058243d in target_read_auxv () at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:368 #15 0x000000000058255c in target_auxv_search (match=0x0, valp=0x7ffdee17c598) at ../../src/gdb/auxv.c:415 #16 0x0000000000a464bb in linux_is_uclinux () at ../../src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:433 #17 0x0000000000a464f6 in linux_has_shared_address_space (gdbarch=0x409a2d0) at ../../src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:440 #18 0x0000000000510eae in gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (gdbarch=0x409a2d0) at ../../src/gdb/gdbarch.c:4889 #19 0x0000000000bc7558 in program_space::~program_space (this=0x4544aa0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at ../../src/gdb/progspace.c:124 #20 0x00000000009b245d in delete_inferior (inf=0x47b3de0) at ../../src/gdb/inferior.c:290 #21 0x00000000009b2c10 in prune_inferiors () at ../../src/gdb/inferior.c:480 #22 0x00000000009c5e3e in fetch_inferior_event () at ../../src/gdb/infrun.c:4558 #23 0x000000000099b4dc in inferior_event_handler (event_type=INF_REG_EVENT) at ../../src/gdb/inf-loop.c:42 #24 0x0000000000cbc64f in remote_async_serial_handler (scb=0x4090a30, context=0x408a6b0) at ../../src/gdb/remote.c:14859 #25 0x0000000000d83d3a in run_async_handler_and_reschedule (scb=0x4090a30) at ../../src/gdb/ser-base.c:138 #26 0x0000000000d83e1f in fd_event (error=0, context=0x4090a30) at ../../src/gdb/ser-base.c:189 So this is problem #1, if we throw an exception while deleting a program_space then this is not caught, and is going to crash GDB. Problem #2 becomes evident when we ask why GDB is throwing an error in this case; the error is thrown because the remote target, operating in non-async mode, can't read the auxv data while an inferior is running and GDB is waiting for a stop reply. The problem here then, is why does GDB get into a position where it tries to interact with the remote target in this way, at this time? The problem is caused by the prune_inferiors call which can be seen in the above backtrace. In prune_inferiors we check if the inferior is deletable, and if it is, we delete it. The problem is, I think, we should also check if the target is currently in a state that would allow us to delete the inferior. We don't currently have such a check available, we'd need to add one, but for the remote target, this would return false if the remote is in async mode and the remote is currently waiting for a stop reply. With this change in place GDB would defer deleting the inferior until the remote target has stopped, at which point GDB would be able to refill the auxv cache successfully. And then, problem #3 becomes evident when we ask why GDB is needing to refill the auxv cache now when it didn't need to for GDB 13. This is where the second commit mentioned above (a282736) comes in. Prior to this commit, the auxv cache was cleared by the executable_changed observer, while after that commit the auxv cache was cleared by the new_objfile observer -- but only when the new_objfile observer is used in the special mode that actually means that all objfiles have been unloaded (I know, the overloading of the new_objfile observer is horrible, and unnecessary, but it's not really important for this bug). The difference arises because the new_objfile observer is triggered from clear_symtab_users, which in turn is called from program_space::~program_space. The new_objfile observer for auxv does this: static void auxv_new_objfile_observer (struct objfile *objfile) { if (objfile == nullptr) invalidate_auxv_cache_inf (current_inferior ()); } That is, when all the objfiles are unloaded, we clear the auxv cache for the current inferior. The problem is, then when we look at the prune_inferiors -> delete_inferior -> ~program_space path, we see that the current inferior is not going to be an inferior that exists within the program_space being deleted; delete_inferior removes the deleted inferior from the global inferior list, and then only deletes the program_space if program_space::empty() returns true, which is only the case if the current inferior isn't within the program_space to delete, and no other inferior exists within that program_space either. What this means is that when the new_objfile observer is called we can't rely on the current inferior having any relationship with the program space in which the objfiles were removed. This was an error in the commit a282736, the only thing we can rely on is the current program space. As a result of this mistake, after commit a282736, GDB was sometimes clearing the auxv cache for a random inferior. In the native target case this was harmless as we can always refill the cache when needed, but in the remote target case, if we need to refill the cache when the remote target is executing, then we get the crash we observed. And additionally, if we think about this a little more, we see that commit a282736 made another mistake. When all the objfiles are removed, they are removed from a program_space, a program_space might contain multiple inferiors, so surely, we should clear the auxv cache for all of the matching inferiors? Given these two insights, that the current_inferior is not relevant, only the current_program_space, and that we should be clearing the cache for all inferiors in the current_program_space, we can update auxv_new_objfile_observer to: if (objfile == nullptr) { for (inferior *inf : all_inferiors ()) { if (inf->pspace == current_program_space) invalidate_auxv_cache_inf (inf); } } With this change we now correctly clear the auxv cache for the correct inferiors, and GDB no longer needs to refill the cache at an inconvenient time, this avoids the crash we were seeing. And finally, we reach problem #4. Inspired by the observation that using the current_inferior from within the ~program_space function was not correct, I added some debug to see if current_inferior() was called anywhere else (below ~program_space), and the answer is yes, it's called a often. Mostly the culprit is GDB doing: current_inferior ()->top_target ()-> .... But I think all of these calls are most likely doing the wrong thing, and only work because the top target in all these cases is shared between all inferiors, e.g. it's the native target, or the remote target for all inferiors. But if we had a truly multi-connection setup, then we might start to see odd behaviour. Problem #1 I'm just ignoring for now, I guess at some point we might run into this again, and then we'd need to solve this. But in this case I wasn't sure what a "good" solution would look like. We need the auxv data in order to implement the linux_is_uclinux() function. If we can't get the auxv data then what should we do, assume yes, or assume no? The right answer would probably be to propagate the error back up the stack, but then we reach ~program_space, and throwing exceptions from a destructor is problematic, so we'd need to catch and deal at this point. The linux_is_uclinux() call is made from within gdbarch_has_shared_address_space(), which is used like: if (!gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (target_gdbarch ())) delete this->aspace; So, we would have to choose; delete the address space or not. If we delete it on error, then we might delete an address space that is shared within another program space. If we don't delete the address space, then we might leak it. Neither choice is great. A better solution might be to have the address spaces be reference counted, then we could remove the gdbarch_has_shared_address_space call completely, and just rely on the reference count to auto-delete the address space when appropriate. The solution for problem #2 I already hinted at above, we should have a new target_can_delete_inferiors() call, which should be called from prune_inferiors, this would prevent GDB from trying to delete inferiors when a (remote) target is in a state where we know it can't delete the inferior. Deleting an inferior often (always?) requires sending packets to the remote, and if the remote is waiting for a stop reply then this will never work, so the pruning should be deferred in this case. The solution for problem #3 is included in this commit. And, for problem #4, I'm not sure what the right solution is. Maybe delete_inferior should ensure the inferior to be deleted is in place when ~program_space is called? But that seems a little weird, as the current inferior would, in theory, still be using the current program_space... Anyway, after this commit, the gdb.python/py-progspace-events.exp test now passes when run with the native-extended-remote board. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30935 Approved-By: Simon Marchi <[email protected]> Change-Id: I41f0e6e2d7ecc1e5e55ec170f37acd4052f46eaf
a4lg
force-pushed
the
riscv-dis-opt1-req-reorganize
branch
from
October 19, 2023 03:17
58372fa
to
537ca14
Compare
This commit adds support for RV32E disassembling which turns x16-x31 into invalid16-invalid31 while disassembling. It also changes the style so that style-aware disassembler can distinguish regular GPRs and invalid RVE registers. gas/ChangeLog: * testsuite/gas/riscv/e-ext-dis.s: New RV32E disassembler test. * testsuite/gas/riscv/e-ext-dis-rv32e.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/e-ext-dis-rv32i.d: Likewise. include/ChangeLog: * opcode/riscv.h: Add RVE register name definitions. opcodes/ChangeLog: * riscv-dis.c (init_riscv_dis_state_for_arch_and_options): Apply RVE register names when the E extension is enabled. (print_gpr): New function to print a GPR. (print_insn_args): Use print_gpr to print a GPR. * riscv-opc.c (riscv_gpr_names_rve_numeric): New. (riscv_gpr_names_rve_abi): New.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Wiki Page (details): https://github.com/a4lg/binutils-gdb/wiki/riscv_dis_rv32e