You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi,I have some doubts about the ```fli``` instruction.
I'm not sure. If the number 0-31 is used instead of the table "Immediate values loaded by the FLI.S instruction", how can this reflect the actual floating point of the load at the instruction level? Is it more appropriate to use fli.h ft1, -1.0 instead of fli.h ft1, 0?
As I explained earlier, this is not the right place to talk about this (since I only implement draft Zfa specification of riscv/riscv-isa-manual). After the Zfa extension is changed, I will consider changing it.
I'm not sure. If the number 0-31 is used instead of the table "Immediate values loaded by the FLI.S instruction", how can this reflect the actual floating point of the load at the instruction level? Is it more appropriate to use
fli.h ft1, -1.0
instead offli.h ft1, 0
?Originally posted by @jinma-work in #56 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: