Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error for unrecognized lift manifest fields. #47

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jsirois
Copy link
Contributor

@jsirois jsirois commented Sep 23, 2023

Fixes #46

Point to the manifest format docs and make these easier to access
via new support for `science doc open <page>` to enable using
`science doc open manifest` to directly oprn the manifest docs.
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
name = "igs"
description = "Test interpreter group selection."

[lift.scie-jump]
[lift.scie_jump]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

N.B.: Before adding any tests, the existing tests failed here on the scie-jump mis-spell. This same silent (before) error was what bit @huonw in scie-pants recently.

tests/data/unrecognized-config-fields.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/data/unrecognized-config-fields.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
@jsirois jsirois merged commit 73bb519 into a-scie:main Sep 24, 2023
6 checks passed
@jsirois jsirois deleted the issues/46 branch September 24, 2023 00:50
jsirois added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2023
The logic introduced in #47 was overly complex. There is never an active
`DocConfig` outside a `science doc ...` command invocation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error for unrecognized keys in the lift table tree when parsing a lift manifest.
2 participants