Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Should we distinguish center turn lanes? #184

Open
dabreegster opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Should we distinguish center turn lanes? #184

dabreegster opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested schema Schema changes

Comments

@dabreegster
Copy link
Contributor

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185226351 (an alleyway) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742718564 (a larger road with a center turn lane) both come up as

{
  "type": "travel",
  "direction": "both", 
  "designated": "motor_vehicle",
} 

I'm starting to think center turn lanes are some edge case. They're not really travel lanes; you generally can't just drive through one of them in either directions. (Or they become a regular turn lane close to the intersection and cease to be a shared turn lane.)

I want to distinguish these two cases in A/B Street. In the short-term I can detect the difference based on the total number of lanes, but I'm wondering if we should consider a type = shared_turn or something

@dabreegster dabreegster added question Further information is requested schema Schema changes labels May 3, 2022
@BudgieInWA
Copy link
Collaborator

I wonder if the property turn: "left" is the right hint for A/B Street to look at, because you should be routing carefully down direction: "both" lanes anyway, and signs or markings that specify a turn also prohibit anyone from using it for anything other than a turn.

I think that the center turn lane should appear as a both ways travel lane with a marked turn, but it would be convenient to also be told that the lane matches what we would call a "shared turn lane".

@droogmic
Copy link
Collaborator

droogmic commented May 5, 2022

Another thing I thought about:

Do either of you remember suicide overtaking lanes? That is a third type of direction: "both"... (albeit a now extinct type).

in living streets: routing should be normal
in centre turn lanes: routing should use it for waiting to turn across traffic
in suicide overtaking lanes: routing should avoid using the lane at all!

@dabreegster
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think you're both right -- we don't need a special new type here. The thing that more flexibly distinguishes all the variations would be the addition of lane-level turn restrictions. That's been on my mind to add, but probably not a priority yet.

Do either of you remember suicide overtaking lanes?

No, I had to look these up! I'm familiar with crossing the center line on some rural highways, but the idea of a lane meant for both directions to accelerate and overtake traffic sounds almost comically dangerous!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
question Further information is requested schema Schema changes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants