Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revision of content / Contentbereinigung wäre wünschenswert #11

Open
ctriroli opened this issue Dec 2, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Revision of content / Contentbereinigung wäre wünschenswert #11

ctriroli opened this issue Dec 2, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@ctriroli
Copy link

ctriroli commented Dec 2, 2012

In the content of the beta-test is faulty data. For the author endpoint for example there are values like ( (einer der Begründer der deutschen Germanistik) ) or ( * * * ). Further there are duplicates ( 32 duplicate URI-values on the endpoint author).
The faulty data is breaks up the flow of testing a little bit. A revision would be nice.
If content relevant issues do not belong here, just delete the issue or communicate to somewhere appopriate.


Im Content sind Testdaten bzw. fehlerhafte Inhalte, wie beispielsweise zum endpoint author ( (einer der Begründer der deutschen Germanistik) ) oder auch ( * * * ). Darüber hinaus scheinen Dubletten zu existieren (32 doppelte URI-Werte zum endpoint author).
Beim Test stören die fehlerhaften Daten etwas. Eine Bereinigung wäre wünschenswert.
Wenn contentbezogene Issues hier nicht hingehören, einfach meine Meldung löschen.

@spier
Copy link

spier commented Dec 7, 2012

A first step to make the author information much cleaner would be to strip the additional white spaces which can be found before and after the author names, as well as in the middle of multiple names.
Here are some examples of such errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants