You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, in the process of using the code, I found that the curvature of the planned trajectory would not conform to the curvature constraint. May I ask whether the constraint became a soft constraint after being converted into the objective function? (forward and backward max kappa is 1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From a theoretical perspective, soft constraints should also be limited within an acceptable range. However, in this case, the violation is clearly excessive and unscientific.
After debugging, we discovered a parameter bug in this version of the code. The penalty weight for the curvature feasibility constraint was noticeably small, so we increased it accordingly. Additionally, the completeness and quality of our algorithm depend on the number of polynomial pieces, which we also slightly increased.
After resolving these bugs, the maximum curvature was 1.01, and the amount of violation was within an acceptable range. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention, and we have updated the code accordingly.
If you require more detailed technical assistance, please feel free to contact me: [email protected]
Hello, in the process of using the code, I found that the curvature of the planned trajectory would not conform to the curvature constraint. May I ask whether the constraint became a soft constraint after being converted into the objective function?
(forward and backward max kappa is 1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: