-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorrect configuration for shadowsocks-rust ss_tunnel #3646
Comments
Thanks! However, the fix seems to have introduced a new issue. When installing the new version, the following error was shown:
The same error is shown when starting the service.
Please let me know if any additional information is needed. |
Thanks, It's fixed. New Snapshot is compiling. |
Thank you for the prompt update! I didn't notice it was due to the missing
According to shadowsocks/shadowsocks-rust#1420, |
Fixed again, this time it should work. |
Thanks so much! |
Thanks it's fixed, this explain why it was not working correctly... |
Expected Behavior
According to the configuration of shadowsocks-rust, for tunnel mode, the
forward_address
andforward_port
should be set.Current Behavior
The current implementation of shadowsocks-rust in OpenMPTCProuter follows the configuration of shadowsocks-libev, forward address and port are configured in
tunnel_address
, which is not used by shadowsocks-rust. As a result, ss_tunnel will not start.Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Keep the default setting of ss_tunnel.dns and it won't start. The following message can be found in the log.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: