Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Fix for 17 vulnerabilities #34

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 17 vulnerabilities #34

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kaocher82
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 681/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.2		 Command Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASHTEMPLATE-1088054		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Out-of-Bounds
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-535498		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 761/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.8		 NULL Pointer Dereference
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-535500		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 536/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.3		 Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540958		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 536/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.3		 Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540964		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540978		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 536/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.3		 NULL Pointer Dereference
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540992		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Out-of-Bounds
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540998		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 654/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 8.8		 Use After Free
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-541000		 Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-JS-NODESASS-541002		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5		 Prototype Poisoning
SNYK-JS-QS-3153490		 No Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-REQUEST-3361831		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-TOUGHCOOKIE-5672873		 Yes Proof of Concept
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:debug:20170905		 No Proof of Concept
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:ms:20170412		 No No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5		 Prototype Override Protection Bypass
npm:qs:20170213		 No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: gulp-coffee The new version differs by 6 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: gulp-connect The new version differs by 7 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: gulp-sass The new version differs by 42 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: gulp-uglify The new version differs by 9 commits.
  • e4f9045 2.0.0
  • 566ec6a refactor(tests): write tests with mocha
  • 5651111 refactor(tests): replace `cmem` with `testdouble`
  • b82387b refactor(tests): compose streams with `mississippi` utilities
  • 1232c3c fix(errors): emit errors of type `GulpUglifyError`
  • 5632cee fix(minifer): use `gulplog` for the warning
  • 8160697 feat(minifier): use UglifyJS 2.7.0's input map support
  • 3ec8fc3 chore(package): update uglify-js to version 2.7.0
  • a9c55b9 doc(README): spelling mistake in example

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 NULL Pointer Dereference
🦉 Uncontrolled Recursion
🦉 More lessons are available in Snyk Learn

@snyk-bot
fix: package.json & package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities
a085b82 
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASHTEMPLATE-1088054
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-535498
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-535500
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540958
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540964
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540978
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540992
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-540998
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-541000
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODESASS-541002
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-QS-3153490
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-REQUEST-3361831
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-TOUGHCOOKIE-5672873
- https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:debug:20170905
- https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:ms:20170412
- https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:qs:20170213
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kaocher82 @snyk-bot