Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x264 quality regression #2087

Closed
totaam opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

x264 quality regression #2087

totaam opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

Issue migrated from trac ticket # 2087

component: encodings | priority: critical | resolution: fixed

2018-12-19 01:37:46: antoine created the issue


Discovered as part of #2086, the picture is really messed up despite the high quality setting.

This is what it looks like:
[[Image(tkdiff.png)]]

The changelog is here: [/log/xpra/trunk/src/xpra/codecs/enc_x264].
What stands out:

  • r21114 threading
  • r20519 preset
  • r20399 bandwidth limit
  • r20392 "grain" tuning for text content - probably not the one (manually reverted to test)
@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 01:38:09: antoine uploaded file tkdiff.png (234.5 KiB)

tkdiff very degraded
tkdiff.png

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 01:43:32: antoine changed status from new to assigned

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 01:43:32: antoine edited the issue description

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 17:53:40: nathan_lstc commented


I have updated and deployed to this user. He reports that with --video-encoders=vpx,nvenc things are much better.

Thank you.

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 18:03:29: antoine changed priority from major to critical

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 18:03:29: antoine commented


So the problem comes from bandwidth-limit integration (r20399)

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 18:22:30: antoine changed status from assigned to closed

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 18:22:30: antoine set resolution to fixed

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator Author

totaam commented Dec 19, 2018

2018-12-19 18:22:30: antoine commented


Fixed in r21249. (was some left-over test code)

@totaam totaam closed this as completed Dec 19, 2018
@totaam totaam added the v2.4.x label Jan 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant