Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"braces" v3.0.2 / "micromatch" v4.0.5 vulnerabilities #306

Closed
sbradnick opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed

"braces" v3.0.2 / "micromatch" v4.0.5 vulnerabilities #306

sbradnick opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@sbradnick
Copy link

sbradnick commented May 15, 2024

Getting a report of: "A vulnerable version (3.0.2) of the braces package is embedded in" and I do see this:

$ grep -ir braces .
...
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:    "node_modules/braces": {
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/braces/-/braces-3.0.2.tgz",
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:        "braces": "^3.0.2",
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:    "braces": {
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/braces/-/braces-3.0.2.tgz",
./xpra-html5/package-lock.json:        "braces": "^3.0.2",

Some references here: micromatch/braces#35 but there hasn't been a commit to that repo in 5 years.

EDIT: I do see this too: micromatch/braces#37 - hopefully that moves forward.

@sbradnick sbradnick changed the title "braces" "braces" v3.0.2 vulnerability May 15, 2024
@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 15, 2024

I'm not really bothered about build time stuff.
Also happy to remove the lot.

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 16, 2024

TBH, this came from a drive-by contribution which is causing me pain to this day.
Can we just get rid of all this nonsense? How?

@sbradnick
Copy link
Author

TBH, this came from a drive-by contribution which is causing me pain to this day. Can we just get rid of all this nonsense? How?

The whole of npm & package-lock.json was someone else's additon? I'm not much of a node user (unless it makes an appearance in something else I'm trying to use and I can just let it 'do it's thing'), so I don't know if those offending additions can simply be removed w/o causing some type of node dependency problem. "micromatch" requires "braces" / "micromatch" is required by "fast-glob"/"lint-staged", that type of thing ...

Another CVE was added too: micromatch/micromatch#243 (the comments in that one, wow ...)

$ grep -ir micromatch .
./package-lock.json:        "micromatch": "^4.0.4"
./package-lock.json:        "micromatch": "^4.0.4",
./package-lock.json:    "node_modules/micromatch": {
./package-lock.json:      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/micromatch/-/micromatch-4.0.5.tgz",
./package-lock.json:        "micromatch": "^4.0.4"
./package-lock.json:        "micromatch": "^4.0.4",
./package-lock.json:    "micromatch": {
./package-lock.json:      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/micromatch/-/micromatch-4.0.5.tgz",

@sbradnick sbradnick changed the title "braces" v3.0.2 vulnerability "braces" v3.0.2 / "micromatch" v4.0.5 vulnerabilities May 16, 2024
@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 16, 2024

It started relatively small: 41d3c2d
And now we have a 6617 lines monster.
When I say remove, I'm thinking of just removing everything node related.
It doesn't help me get things done in any shape or form, and just like this ticket, it causes pain.

@sbradnick
Copy link
Author

When I say remove, I'm thinking of just removing everything node related.

Makes sense to me, I couldn't even begin to tell you what any of those packages are adding and if xpra-html5 functions just fine w/o them (and their extra complexity), it seems like a good thing to remove. And if there's any type of "braces" and "micromatch" CVE resolution, maybe they could be added back (I'm certainly not advocating that, I didn't even know they were a part of xpra-html5 until I got a bug report assigned to me 😜) if there is some type of value-add [to someone].

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 17, 2024

I couldn't even begin to tell you what any of those packages are adding and if xpra-html5 functions just fine w/o them

These are just commit or push hooks.
They add nothing to xpra, they are not bundled with an installation, not even in the source releases.

So, the risk of harm from these two CVEs is pretty much zero. I can control-C if somehow my build takes too long.

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 17, 2024

Also helps with #277 by not having to track down all of this crap

@sbradnick
Copy link
Author

Thanks to your explanation of how "braces" and "micromatch" are (not really) integrated to xpra-html5, the bugs (on my end) have been closed, so I'll close this. I really appreciate you conversing with me about it.

@paulmillr
Copy link

There is NO vulnerability: micromatch/braces#37 (comment)

@totaam
Copy link
Collaborator

totaam commented May 21, 2024

Nonetheless, there may well be other vulnerabilities in this monstrous node lock file, and none of them matter because they're not even being used. So I still want to get rid of this mess.

@totaam totaam mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants