Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Site editor: preload post and template lookups if needed #7695

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ellatrix
Copy link
Member

@ellatrix ellatrix commented Oct 31, 2024

See:

Trac ticket:


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props ellatrix, swissspidy, mamaduka.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ static function ( $classes ) {
),
);

if ( ! empty( $_GET['postId'] ) ) {
$preload_paths[] = add_query_arg( 'context', 'edit', rest_get_route_for_post( $_GET['postId'] ) );
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is lacking any sort of sanitization.

Also rest_get_route_for_post can return an empty string if no post is found, in which case one wouldn't want do add this to the array.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the empty string check has already been added in GB.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fixed. Is get_post enough sanitisation?

@ellatrix ellatrix changed the title Site editor: preload post if needed Site editor: preload post and template lookups if needed Nov 1, 2024
$block_editor_context = new WP_Block_Editor_Context( array( 'name' => 'core/edit-site' ) );
$context_settings = array( 'name' => 'core/edit-site' );

if ( ! empty( $_GET['postId'] ) ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's verify that postId is an int value.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@ellatrix ellatrix force-pushed the add/site-editor-preload-post branch from b3481f1 to fb43af1 Compare November 1, 2024 11:36
Copy link
Member

@jorgefilipecosta jorgefilipecosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works well in my tests and the code looks good 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants