-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent scroll bleed in the inserter #656
Prevent scroll bleed in the inserter #656
Comments
For the most part #578 fixes this as well. I will touch it up to make the scrolling in the container a little better hopefully soon. |
So, I think I've found the path forward for how to prevent scroll bleed. As it turns out, WordPress already has a pretty remarkable body class called It's kind of magic, and it means all we have to do in order to prevent scroll bleed is apply that class to I would suggest we apply it to:
Note to self, I need to look into the CSS that powers this. It is strong voodoo. You can test the behavior already. Just scroll down the page to an image, click the edit button and see the media modal appear. Notice how the scrollbars are locked, but that you don't lose your place, and they are unlocked when you close the modal again. Edit: Actually I forgot about the jog that the scrollbar makes. It seems like without some way to account for that, this is only good for mobile. :sadface: |
This is an experiment. Instead of scrolling the `body` element, it scrolls the editor and sidebar individually. This has a number of benefits: 1. It fixes scroll bleed entirely (see #656) Scroll bleed is when you scroll to the end of an individually scrolling container, and start scrolling the content below it. Scroll bleed is particularly a problem on mobile, and if we can refactor to use this type of layout, we can have a vastly improved mobile experience in one fell swoop. 2. It drastically simplifies fixed position elements. The header, for example, no longer has to be fixed position at all. It can just sit there. This also has benefits on the responsive stuff, since we now get this for free, as opposed to have to make advanced edgecases for every `left` and `right` value. 3. It fixes the issue of "double scrollbars" (see ##1899) Because the scrollbar is now contextual to the element being scrolled, everything visually works as expected. There are downsides too. We initially avoided this approach because scrolling on mobile just couldn't be made to behave in a good way. For example, on an iPhone you could "drag down" (to scroll) on the fixed top bar, and scroll the _page itself_, and invoke that overflow bounce that iOS is famous for, looking jarring. The expected behavior here would be that dragging on the fixed top bar wouldn't do anything at all, since it's not part of a scrollable element. However recent changes in mobile safari appear to have fixed this, that's why it's seems worth revisiting. I'm also unsure of what possible accesibility implications are of this, so @afercia please chime in if you have thoughts here. One final downside is that if you are viewing the editor in an iPad in landscape mode, and expect to be able to scroll the page by dragging on the left hand navigation menu (the one with Dashboard, Posts, Media, Pages, etc.) you won't be scrolling the page. Because again, this is not a scrollable element anymore. It feels like there are a ton of upsides to this approach, but it needs a _lot_ of testing, so don't anyone celebrate. But it seems really really worth trying.
This is in master! Praise Higgs! |
Scroll bleed is when you scroll to the end of a scrollable element and start scrolling the element below it. The inserter has it. We should look at how to best prevent this.
Here are a few ways to do it:https://codepen.io/joen/pen/wGbBoehttps://codepen.io/joen/pen/wGLjWGhttps://codepen.io/joen/pen/dMEyjrhttps://codepen.io/joen/pen/Kzjgqyhttps://codepen.io/joen/pen/wGONLBWhich ever we pick here, it's likely a function we'd want to be able to reuse, as this issue is likely to pop up in many areas.Please see this comment for a much better approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: