You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was thinking through alternatives for #49524 — which aims to reduce the steps it takes to group blocks as a row, stack or grid when I thought of leveraging nested dropdowns as an alternative.
As-is, you need to first group the blocks via the block options > "Group" control, then open the block inspector and select one of the variant icons from the card up top. This idea explores leveraging the pending nested dropdown support, allowing for direct transforming between each of the group variations.
I don't love "Group" > "Group". Perhaps "Group as..." could be an alternative, or some other copy to convey grouping/wrapping.
From the ideas from #49524 I like this the most.
"Group as…" also works very well and explains easily the mental model that rows, stacks and grids are actually Group block variations.
I only wonder if the nested dropdown adds friction again. It really depends on how fast and intuitively the nested level opens.
To get around it we could introduce a shortcut for grouping blocks (by the way, thinking out lout here… will/would the shortcut and an icon work in the menu?) Edit: I just saw the DropdownMenu v2 in Stylebook All my doubts are gone. Nice! @ciampo Very well done!
I was thinking through alternatives for #49524 — which aims to reduce the steps it takes to group blocks as a row, stack or grid when I thought of leveraging nested dropdowns as an alternative.
As-is, you need to first group the blocks via the block options > "Group" control, then open the block inspector and select one of the variant icons from the card up top. This idea explores leveraging the pending nested dropdown support, allowing for direct transforming between each of the group variations.
I don't love "Group" > "Group". Perhaps "Group as..." could be an alternative, or some other copy to convey grouping/wrapping.
Related: #50459, #49271
Visual
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: