Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📃 Address SEC blockchain objectives #2

Open
JFWooten4 opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

📃 Address SEC blockchain objectives #2

JFWooten4 opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Member

JFWooten4 commented Sep 17, 2024

In the intermediate section of the TAR comment, address the main staff items:

  1. Performance:
    • Does it work and will it continue to work as intended?
  2. Transaction speed and throughput:
    • Can it process transactions quickly enough for the intended application(s)?
  3. Scalability:
    • Can it handle a potential increase in network activity?
  4. Resiliency:
    • Can it absorb the impact of a problem in one or more parts of its system and continue processing transactions without data loss or corruption?1
  5. Security and consensus mechanism:
    • Can it detect and defend against malicious attacks, such as 51% attacks or Denial-of-Service attacks, without data loss or corruption?
  6. Complexity:
    • Can it be understood, maintained, and improved?
  7. Extensibility:
    • Can it have new functionality added and continue processing transactions without data loss or corruption?
  8. Visibility:
    • Are its associated code, standards, applications, and data publicly available and well documented?
  9. Governance:
    • How are protocol updates and changes agreed to and implemented?
    • What are the impacts of events such as protocol upgrades, hard forks, airdrops, exchanges of one digital asset for another, or staking on the digital asset security?
    • How do any foundations play a role in the protocol's development, and to what extend does this centralize the operations of the network.

Relates tangentially to S-D767. 🖋️

Footnotes

  1. In re internal dialogue with Ukrainian banks, incorporate status analysis.

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Member Author

For network governance, see quote from the Stellar Development Foundation's Chief Product here:

An interesting thing about Stellar is that it actually has like governance baked right into the protocol, right? And it's one of the first networks that... had a clear government structure. You have configuration variables, validators can can vote on them, there's a protocol upgrade, you know validators need to vote on them.

Which deeply implicates this in re action.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Status: Pending (TAR2)
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant