Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The output of kitti_native_evaluation #69

Open
PuJanhan opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

The output of kitti_native_evaluation #69

PuJanhan opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@PuJanhan
Copy link

Thanks for your work, I modified model and trained it .I want to evaluate the model, But the output of kitti_native_evaluation is a empty file named plot . How do I evaluate the modified model?

@WeijingShi
Copy link
Owner

Hi @PuJanhan, Do you see any warnings or errors when you use kitti_native_evaluation? Does it give the evaluation results?

@PuJanhan
Copy link
Author

Hi,I use python3 run.py checkpoints/car_auto_T3_train/ --dataset_root_dir DATASET_ROOT_DIR --output_dir DIR_TO_SAVE_RESULTS I get the results and Evaluate output results on the validation split, the result like this:

car_detection_AP : 0.699301, 0.699301, 0.699301
sh: 1:gnuplot: not found
sh: 1:gnuplot: not found
Error: /undefinedfilename in(car_detection_AP.eps)
Operand stack:

Are the three values of car_detection_AP correspond to easy, moderate and hard in your paper? Why are they the same value? The validation split are all easy?

@WeijingShi
Copy link
Owner

Hi @PuJanhan,

  1. Can you check data subdirectory within DIR_TO_SAVE_RESULTS and see how many results files you get? you should see 3,769 files for the validation set. If not, check if the run.py finished without errors.
  2. You also need some dependencies to generate pdf. try to install them, re-compile kitti_native_evaluation.

Hope it helps. Thanks.

@PuJanhan
Copy link
Author

Thanks, I follow your advice and success.

@WeijingShi
Copy link
Owner

Glad to know it works!

@abhigoku10
Copy link

@PuJanhan from your modifications r u getting better results compared to the author ?? can you share the results obtained and the process applied

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants