Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Examples could be modernized #173

Closed
marcoscaceres opened this issue Dec 5, 2016 · 6 comments · Fixed by #272
Closed

Examples could be modernized #173

marcoscaceres opened this issue Dec 5, 2016 · 6 comments · Fixed by #272
Assignees
Labels
category: editorial https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#class-2 Needs Discussion The issue needs more discussion before it can be fixed. Priority: Soon https://speced.github.io/spec-maintenance/about/
Milestone

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

The examples do odd things in strange ways... like use .forEach to map to elements, etc.

They could be much improved.

@cwilso cwilso self-assigned this Jan 5, 2017
@cwilso cwilso added this to the V1 milestone Jan 5, 2017
@toyoshim
Copy link
Contributor

keep this open for update in the future, and may work together with #174

@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

See also #230

@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added the category: editorial https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#class-2 label Sep 13, 2023
@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added the Needs Discussion The issue needs more discussion before it can be fixed. label Sep 30, 2023
@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

The examples are now in the explainer. Let's use this issue to track updating them.

@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

There are still .forEach instances in the main body of the spec, so I will move this back to the CR milestone.

@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google modified the milestones: future-work, CR Oct 2, 2024
@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

As noted in the linked PR, all the examples are now in the non-normative explainer. I removed .forEach and think that's enough for CR review; if there are additional updates that should be done please file new issues. The examples can be fixed in the explainer without having to modify the spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: editorial https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#class-2 Needs Discussion The issue needs more discussion before it can be fixed. Priority: Soon https://speced.github.io/spec-maintenance/about/
Projects
None yet
4 participants