You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really enjoy reading your paper. And looking at the CED prediction and the others from HED and RCF, your results are crisper (according to my eyes). However, I still do not follow (Pages 7 and 9 in the journal paper) about the quantitative comparison for the crispness. Please, could you give me more details?
Do you think that if I evaluate the prediction without NMS and setting d= d_0/4, could I obtain a fair comparison for the crispness evaluation?
Xavier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @Wangyupei,
I really enjoy reading your paper. And looking at the CED prediction and the others from HED and RCF, your results are crisper (according to my eyes). However, I still do not follow (Pages 7 and 9 in the journal paper) about the quantitative comparison for the crispness. Please, could you give me more details?
Do you think that if I evaluate the prediction without NMS and setting d= d_0/4, could I obtain a fair comparison for the crispness evaluation?
Xavier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: