You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's becoming increasingly difficult to keep track of a moving target, especially now that PAAPI is GA in Chrome.
I'd like to suggest the following:
explicit version numbering and release notes for every change to the explainer and API
clear policy for how API calls are expected to be able to determine what features are available
clear indication of which features are backwards-compatible, and which are breaking changes
no breaking changes that require either buyers or sellers to make significant changes to their implementation
For example:
How would a buyer know whether or rely on availability of recency in their bidding logic?
How would buyers and seller know when the previous request headers will no longer be acceptable by the API?
How would a seller know if they should request additional bids in the contextual auction, given that Sellers are responsible for passing additional bids to the browser at Protected Audience auction time ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was a very large change to https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/FLEDGE.md -- you can see the diff compare here -- which includes a variety of changes:
recency
tobrowserSignals
It's becoming increasingly difficult to keep track of a moving target, especially now that PAAPI is GA in Chrome.
I'd like to suggest the following:
For example:
recency
in their bidding logic?Sellers are responsible for passing additional bids to the browser at Protected Audience auction time
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: