Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error during provision process #577

Closed
fa7ad opened this issue Feb 20, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Error during provision process #577

fa7ad opened this issue Feb 20, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@fa7ad
Copy link

fa7ad commented Feb 20, 2015

Hello,
I cloned the repo today and tried to setup a vagrant box, during the provisioning this was part of the output in red color (I assume its stderr).

==> default: /srv/www/wordpress-develop/node_modules/grunt/node_modules/findup-sync/lib/findup-sync.js:33
==> default:     }).flatten().uniq().value();
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default:  
==> default: ^
==> default: TypeError: Object Gruntfile.js has no method 'flatten'
==> default:     at Object.module.exports [as findup] (/srv/www/wordpress-develop/node_modules/grunt/node_modules/findup-sync/lib/findup-sync.js:33:8)
==> default:     at Task.task.init (/srv/www/wordpress-develop/node_modules/grunt/lib/grunt/task.js:427:16)
==> default:     at Object.grunt.tasks (/srv/www/wordpress-develop/node_modules/grunt/lib/grunt.js:120:8)
==> default:     at Object.module.exports [as cli] (/srv/www/wordpress-develop/node_modules/grunt/lib/grunt/cli.js:38:9)
==> default:     at Object.<anonymous> (/usr/lib/node_modules/grunt-cli/bin/grunt:45:20)
==> default:     at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
==> default:     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
==> default:     at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
==> default:     at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
==> default:     at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:497:

Personally, I only use wordpress_default so, its not much of an issue, but I still think you guys should look at it 😄

@jeremyfelt
Copy link
Member

Thanks @fa7ad, I'm guessing this is directly related to #572. I've left a comment there on a possible cause.

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Feb 23, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants