Added RTDEClient constructor with vector recipes

[dagare]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.14% 🎉

Comparison is base (f328157) 70.21% compared to head (45965ce) 70.35%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #143      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.21%   70.35%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          69       69              
  Lines        2535     2547      +12     
  Branches      324      324              
==========================================
+ Hits         1780     1792      +12     
  Misses        568      568              
  Partials      187      187              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
include/ur_client_library/rtde/rtde_client.h	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/rtde/rtde_client.cpp	55.80% <100.00%> (+1.77%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[urrsk]

@dagare Thanks for this good suggestion.
It would be great If you could add some test to cover and verify this in the PR.
A suggestion could be to extend this test file: https://github.com/UniversalRobots/Universal_Robots_Client_Library/blob/master/tests/test_rtde_client.cpp

[dagare]

I will make a new addition to this PR

[fmauch]

@dagare Thank you for the contribution. Could you please provide some insight why you see this as beneficial?

I'm considering to suggest only allow passing recipes to the RTDEClient class as vectors directly, so parsing a file (if any) would have to be done a level higher up.

@RobertWilbrandt what do you think?

[RobertWilbrandt]

Agreed, i think moving the file handling out of RTDEClient would be a good step.

[urrsk]

I will suggest we add the support first.
When we can consider to deprecate the file dependent constructor later

[urmahp]

Thank you @dagare for the contribution.

I have added a small adjustment, but other than that it looks good.

[urmahp]

Before merging I suggest that we add checks in the constructor to see if the recipes are empty and whether "timestamp" is part of the output_recipe.

[urmahp]

Thank you for the contribution @dagare.