Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify if airline-like void operation is needed #704

Closed
jspetrak opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Clarify if airline-like void operation is needed #704

jspetrak opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jspetrak
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Milestone
3.4.0

Comments

@jspetrak
Copy link
Collaborator

jspetrak commented Sep 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Extracted from #701
@jspetrak jspetrak moved this to To do in OSDM Specification Sep 27, 2024
@jspetrak jspetrak added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Sep 27, 2024
@jspetrak jspetrak added question Further information is requested improvements New feature or request labels Sep 27, 2024
@CGantert345
Copy link
Contributor

CGantert345 commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Not needed, use override code and refund instead.

The Airline Void is used due to the implementation of accounting in Arline systems. There Accounting data are provided after the day of purchase only. Modern systems process these directly.

@CGantert345 CGantert345 moved this from To do to Done in OSDM Specification Oct 4, 2024
@jspetrak jspetrak self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@jspetrak jspetrak changed the title Question - is Void operation needed? Clarify if airline-like void operation is needed Oct 18, 2024
@jspetrak jspetrak added wontfix This will not be worked on and removed improvements New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jspetrak jspetrak

Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
OSDM Specification
Status: Done
Milestone
3.4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jspetrak @CGantert345