Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Low no. of multiplets detected than expected #13

Open
AnjaliC4 opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Low no. of multiplets detected than expected #13

AnjaliC4 opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@AnjaliC4
Copy link

Hi,

I have noticed that no. of multiplets detected by AMULET are proportional to number of cells in singlecell.csv. For clarification, does amulet considers only the cells in singlecell.csv for testing multiplets or does it consider all the barcodes in the singlecell.csv?
Since I am not using 10x cell calling method, I would like for AMULET to detect multiplets from all the barcodes in the singlecell.csv. Is that feasible?

Thanks

@alperoglu
Copy link
Member

Hi Anjali,

AMULET only considers the barcodes that have been labeled as cells with the is_cell_barcode column. You can include other barcodes in the singlecell.csv file by setting their values in the is_cell_barcode column from 0 to 1. However, by doing this you can be including empty droplets' barcodes which will have many reads that will not pass AMULET's quality thresholds. These empty droplets can negatively impact the performance of the algorithm. You can initially run the overlap counting portion of AMULET to get the summary statistics for your barcodes, reads and overlaps. These can give you more insight about which barcodes to consider or not.

Best,
Alper

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants