Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configable WebRtcTransport class + transport implementation #50

Open
iislucas opened this issue Feb 25, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Configable WebRtcTransport class + transport implementation #50

iislucas opened this issue Feb 25, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@iislucas
Copy link
Collaborator

WebRTCTransportProvider currently hard-wires STUN servers. People wanting to use WebRtc for transport (e.g. uProxy) would like to configure both STUN servers and employ TURN servers too (#49). These things are specific to WebRTC, so maybe don't want to be in Transport API. But we do want the option to use/specify them...

One way to do this is to make a WebRtc class that uses peer-connection and does all the work, and is configurable. Then the WebRTCTransportProvider is a lightweight wrapper around this class with some reasonable set defaults.

@Paul-E
Copy link
Collaborator

Paul-E commented Feb 25, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants