Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(functionliteraltypes): add some compatibility for functions without type definition #889

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

uittorio
Copy link
Member

@uittorio uittorio commented Aug 30, 2021

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • You have added tests

Hey!! What am I trying to do here?

Basically, I've increased the support for inferred types for function declarations
You can find more details in this issue
#614

I don't know if it will fix everything but it's a start

@uittorio uittorio requested a review from Pmyl August 30, 2021 11:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pmyl Pmyl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice this should cover most use cases

@uittorio uittorio merged commit a21e012 into master Sep 2, 2021
@uittorio uittorio deleted the feat-literal-types branch September 2, 2021 06:58
@typescripttdd
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.4.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants