-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed externalsampler
#2089
Merged
Merged
Fixed externalsampler
#2089
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5bee22a
fixed getparams call in Transition construction for AbstractMCMC
torfjelde 2bf3b8b
bumped patch version
torfjelde 88997aa
fixed getparams implementations for AdvancedHMC and AdvancedMH
torfjelde 3780ca8
fixed ESLogDensityFunction as suggested by @devmotion
torfjelde 348a29d
Revert "fixed ESLogDensityFunction as suggested by @devmotion"
torfjelde f8876d6
Merge branch 'master' into torfjelde/turingtransition-fix
torfjelde 40792c9
removed ESLogDensityFunction
torfjelde 0d9fdfc
fixed typo
torfjelde File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is type piracy (I know it was already there 😉 - and BTW
DynamicPPL.unflatten
below is another instance of type piracy). In DynamicPPL, we explicitly decided to not add this overload: TuringLang/DynamicPPL.jl#501 Can we just remove it completely?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeaaah I'm aware of both and I don't like them 😕
It's done to be compatible with AdvancedMH.jl which allows you to specify the proposal distribution using
NamedTuple
😕 So we can't just remove it without messing with this; we'd have to do some more work for that, unfortunately.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you go to that PR, you can see that it was closed it in favour of another commit that did basically the same thing 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ohh haha I missed that, I just remembered that the issue had been closed 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You okay with this leaving this for now @devmotion ? This PR is meant to fix existing code, so feel like maybe we should get this merged and maybe make an issue / separate PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, let's address this separately.