Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix serialization bug #262

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #261

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Confirmed locally that it fixes the reproducible example in #261

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Lol I guess the way I wrote it is not standard. Gonna change that.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 12, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12325792494

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.8%) to 73.269%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12325790987: 0.8%
Covered Lines: 1439
Relevant Lines: 1964

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.26%. Comparing base (4f4772a) to head (355720f).
Report is 63 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #262      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.09%   73.26%   -8.83%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1748     1964     +216     
==========================================
+ Hits         1435     1439       +4     
- Misses        313      525     +212     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't understand why the serialization test you wrote didn't pick up this bug though. Maybe if you are in the same session the serializer just gets the current object? would be weird.

@sunxd3
Copy link
Member

sunxd3 commented Dec 12, 2024

No I think the test wasn't actually run, fixing at #263

thanks for suggesting looking into it

@sunxd3
Copy link
Member

sunxd3 commented Dec 12, 2024

Sorry for before @miguelbiron the CI should be fixed now, could you uncomment the tests for serialization and see if they run?

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Will do

@miguelbiron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems like activating the tests reduced coverage? Not sure how that could happen. And the benchmark issue seems related to permissions.

@sunxd3
Copy link
Member

sunxd3 commented Dec 13, 2024

benchmark might error because BridgeStan is segfaulting on macOS, so as long as it runs, it's okay

Copy link
Member

@sunxd3 sunxd3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug in deserialization
3 participants