Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
link
andinvlink
should correctly work withSelector
and thusGibbs
#542link
andinvlink
should correctly work withSelector
and thusGibbs
#542Changes from all commits
4de2a01
1e4d9f1
bf4fcc6
f1fde0b
67770d3
4bf5f7c
d15df29
203aeb3
b170c0b
1086731
40cce25
cb2f40e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 913 in src/varinfo.jl
Codecov / codecov/patch
src/varinfo.jl#L913
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not entirely clear to me why this is a
HACK
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe
HACK
isn't quite the right word, but it's somewhat ugly design IMO. And the overall thing of "defining a new_getvns
which does something slightly different only for a particular sampler" is hack.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
space
is nevernothing
though. At "best" it's an empty tuple. Remember,space !== vns
. The scenario withvns === nothing
only comes into play in the next call.