-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check for minimum Tulipa graph criteria #78
Comments
I guess converter & storage can act as both producer & consumer in these rules? Can they be terminal points? |
Kind of... These rules are basically defining a system that produces and consumes the correct energy types, thus at least having the potential to balance. (ignoring capacities) As far as I know, storage and conversion cannot be terminal points. You will always need an outflow to a terminal consumer. Hydro might be a weird case that bends these rules, by having an inflow that's not a producer... ? @datejada @gnawin Valid minimal systems:
Note: I can't remember how we defined Hubs. They might have super powers. |
@suvayu Is this issue still relevant? |
Well, it is still required for completeness. And probably useful also in the main model. I don't know what should be the priority. |
Moving it to IO then. |
Here's a list of minimum graph criteria to check:
This is very basic and I'm sure there's more with specific parameters, so please add your ideas! @datejada @gnawin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: