Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inadequate keywords blocked by "Family filter" #827

Closed
vi opened this issue Sep 5, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Inadequate keywords blocked by "Family filter" #827

vi opened this issue Sep 5, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@vi
Copy link
Contributor

vi commented Sep 5, 2014

For example, searching on "russian channel" shows no obviously "explicit" results, yet both "russian" and "channel" trigger "At least one of the keywords that you used has been blocked by the family filter".

The list of innosent words that trigger the message I found so far:

  • surprise
  • channel, channels
  • anime
  • miss (but not "mister")
  • closeup (but not "zoom" and not "macro")
  • latina, latinos, russian, russians, chinese, indian, polish, mexican (most other nationalities work fine, although "malaysian" leads to 100% filtered results)
  • asian (but not "european", "american", "african" or "australian")
  • spice
  • foot, legs, toe, finger, mouth (but not "wrist, elbow, eye, nose, ear, shoulder[s], head, hand")
  • kitten (but not "puppy")
  • male, female (but not "masculine" or "feminine")
  • girl, schoolgirl (but not "boy" or "schoolboy")
  • Junge, Opa, Oma, Eltern, Tante, Familie (but not "Mädchen", "Tochter" or "Onkel")

Why do we need "At least one of keywords..." at all? Just show "N items were blocked by family filter" (for example, search query "qwerty" leads to "7 items were blocked" with 0 shown.

@ichorid
Copy link
Contributor

ichorid commented Jul 17, 2020

There is already a ticked for familiy filter stuff #1052

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants