Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SnoopCompile.jl #34

Closed
khosravipasha opened this issue Jul 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

SnoopCompile.jl #34

khosravipasha opened this issue Jul 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low priority low priority

Comments

@khosravipasha
Copy link
Collaborator

See if this can help us precompile our unit tests so that common use cases become already precompiled so they load faster.

https://timholy.github.io/SnoopCompile.jl/stable/
@khosravipasha khosravipasha changed the title SnoopCompile.j SnoopCompile.jl Jul 26, 2020
@khosravipasha khosravipasha added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 26, 2020
@khosravipasha khosravipasha added the low priority low priority label Sep 26, 2020
@guyvdbroeck
Copy link
Member

While trying to address this issue, I ran into timholy/SnoopCompile.jl#237

@guyvdbroeck
Copy link
Member

I tried using SnoopCompile to generate precompile statements for LogicCircuits, based on the unit tests, and also once based on the readme code. In either case, I was not able to significantly speed up the second-time usage. I could speed up the readme code from 37 to 28 seconds. That does not seem worth the extra overhead of maintaining the precompile files. I'm not sure why precompilation is so ineffective for us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low priority low priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@guyvdbroeck @khosravipasha