You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not exactly sure if you could somehow have the directshow filter a bit higher in the chain (so that at least shaders could apply to it)
Or if couldn't have the "this was actually interlaced" information be passed down the chain for madvr or whatnot to do the deinterlacing on the upscaled fields (would image quality be higher or lower this way?)
Still, I have this DVD, and currently the only way to somehow ameliorate the situation seems to be the algorithms built in the LAV video decoder (which all more or less suck, with the exception of the CUVID adaptive hw one).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not exactly sure if you could somehow have the directshow filter a bit higher in the chain (so that at least shaders could apply to it)
Or if couldn't have the "this was actually interlaced" information be passed down the chain for madvr or whatnot to do the deinterlacing on the upscaled fields (would image quality be higher or lower this way?)
Still, I have this DVD, and currently the only way to somehow ameliorate the situation seems to be the algorithms built in the LAV video decoder (which all more or less suck, with the exception of the CUVID adaptive hw one).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: