Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GLA Sneak Attack can be abused with China Neutron Shells to make Tunnel Networks unusable for long periods #361

Open
xezon opened this issue Sep 15, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
Design Is a matter of game design Minor Severity: Minor < Major < Critical < Blocker Survey Is subject to a survey question

Comments

@xezon
Copy link
Collaborator

xezon commented Sep 15, 2021

GLA Sneak Attack can be abused with China Neutron Shells to make Tunnel Networks unusable for long periods.

A solution to solve this problem is adding a sell or destroy button on the Sneak Attack Tunnel.

See also:

@xezon xezon added the Bug Something is not working right label Sep 15, 2021
@xezon xezon changed the title Hitting GLA Sneak Attack with China Neutron Shells will make Tunnel Networks unusable for the rest of the match GLA Sneak Attack can be abused with China Neutron Shells to make Tunnel Networks unusable for long periods Sep 15, 2021
@xezon xezon added Design Is a matter of game design and removed Bug Something is not working right labels Sep 15, 2021
@Jundiyy
Copy link
Collaborator

Jundiyy commented Sep 15, 2021

I don't understand the abuse here, is it that the player can keep the Sneak Attack alive and keeping attacking it?
If so, I don't think that's a bad thing, why deploy it there in the first place. I do that to Tunnel Networks as well if I know I can counter it, let it build up, destroy it to the hole and let it build up.

Although having a destroy button wouldn't be 'bad' I suppose.
But allowing that would mean the player is denied the xp they would have got from destroying the Sneak Attack.

Not the same thing but it's also the case when you trap a hero unit into a corner and build a defence so it can't get out but don't kill it as well. Now they can't use the hero or make a new one.

My thoughts are to leave it the way it is.

@MTKing4
Copy link
Collaborator

MTKing4 commented Sep 15, 2021

Not an abuse, leave it as it is

@xezon xezon added the Survey Is subject to a survey question label Sep 15, 2021
@xezon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xezon commented Sep 15, 2021

I think this is something that can be asked in a Survey.

@xezon xezon added the Minor Severity: Minor < Major < Critical < Blocker label Sep 17, 2021
@RisingZH
Copy link

Leave as is/not an issue.

Don’t like a destroy button, no other building has this so would be weird if sneaks did.

@commy2
Copy link
Collaborator

commy2 commented Sep 19, 2021

no other building has this so would be weird if sneaks did

This. It would be very strange.

Only exception would be Demo. Demo has Suicide on Tunnel and Stinger Site, but not the Sneak Attack. Would be neat if Demo had Suicide on the Sneak Attack.

@FinAminToastCrunch
Copy link

Leave it as is. Sneak attacks are strong enough vs china as it is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Design Is a matter of game design Minor Severity: Minor < Major < Critical < Blocker Survey Is subject to a survey question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants