We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dear @debapriyamaji, thanks a lot for providing the code of YOLOv5Pose. I was wondering,
Did you release the scripts (functions, classes, utilities) for quantization?
Could you please provide more details about the mixed-precision results?
Any pointer it's highly appreciated, as it's my first time using Pytorch quantization API.
I'm using the Pytorch Quantization API. I added the corresponding torch.quantization.QuantStub/DeQuantStub & nn.quantized.FloatFunctional boilerplate.
torch.quantization.QuantStub
DeQuantStub
nn.quantized.FloatFunctional
ATM I achieve low performance with static PTQ & QINT8. I'm testing on my desktop CPU, i.e., I haven't done on-device testing yet.
Dataset: COCO-val Quantization type: Static PTQ Model: yolov5s6_pose_640_ti_lite/last.pt (md5sum: f3a72894e9d0d4a4095174b0e795d7b8) Data type: QINT8
yolov5s6_pose_640_ti_lite/last.pt
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.079 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.289 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.012 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.053 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.118 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.248 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.618 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.147 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.171 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.353
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
❔Question
Dear @debapriyamaji, thanks a lot for providing the code of YOLOv5Pose. I was wondering,
Did you release the scripts (functions, classes, utilities) for quantization?
Could you please provide more details about the mixed-precision results?
Any pointer it's highly appreciated, as it's my first time using Pytorch quantization API.
Additional context
I'm using the Pytorch Quantization API. I added the corresponding
torch.quantization.QuantStub
/DeQuantStub
&nn.quantized.FloatFunctional
boilerplate.ATM I achieve low performance with static PTQ & QINT8. I'm testing on my desktop CPU, i.e., I haven't done on-device testing yet.
Results
Dataset: COCO-val
Quantization type: Static PTQ
Model:
yolov5s6_pose_640_ti_lite/last.pt
(md5sum: f3a72894e9d0d4a4095174b0e795d7b8)Data type: QINT8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: