Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
I'm unclear about the purpose of this discussion. If the issue has already been identified and included for resolution, why initiate a separate discussion? 🤔 Please feel free to contribute directly to issue #1489 if there's something specific you'd like to emphasize or ensure is considered during its resolution |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Goal
Atribute semantics to Lists component to implement accessibility corretly.
div
. Is necessary use<ul>
and<li>
to have semantic HTML.(Already reported in issue → Accessibility: Components | Lists #1489)
Context
In our accessibility specs developed by the design teams of APP Vivo, this cases have frequently documented. But the developers are not able to assign the all properties in the code.
Is possible to use "role=list" and "role=listItem" but this use don't atribute if the List is ordered or unordered. Another point is that more practical to devs if the semantic comes by default in the component.
Impact
Improvements and compliance with accessibility guidelines.
Discussion Questions
None
Additional considerations
No response
Do you have a visual proposal?
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions