You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know a lot have been discussed about tags, but I'm not sure about this point.
I'm guessing that currently, every tag that has been used up to now is suggested in the tag text input.
However, several (many?) of these tags are erroneous. For example there is a @no tag, or there are some @Chamge@change' @chaneg tags, which were simply a typo in the @change tag.
I corrected the involved sentences, thus removing the tags, but they still appear. That's how I realized the problem. Looking for the @no tag in "Browse by tags" page gives no results.
I wonder if it would be desirable to suggest only tags with at least one sentence, plus the "@ maintenance tags". Or maybe that's already the case, and that's why I only realized @no, @chaneg, etc. and in this case, another way of thinking is required.
Although my personal opinion is that @-tags that are not currently in used need not be suggested. As long as we know that maintenance tags start with @, any name is okay (and the common ones definitely have more than one sentence). So it would really be only about displaying tags who are currently in use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I know a lot have been discussed about tags, but I'm not sure about this point.
I'm guessing that currently, every tag that has been used up to now is suggested in the tag text input.
However, several (many?) of these tags are erroneous. For example there is a @no tag, or there are some @Chamge @change' @chaneg tags, which were simply a typo in the @change tag.
I corrected the involved sentences, thus removing the tags, but they still appear. That's how I realized the problem. Looking for the @no tag in "Browse by tags" page gives no results.
I wonder if it would be desirable to suggest only tags with at least one sentence, plus the "@ maintenance tags". Or maybe that's already the case, and that's why I only realized @no, @chaneg, etc. and in this case, another way of thinking is required.
Although my personal opinion is that @-tags that are not currently in used need not be suggested. As long as we know that maintenance tags start with @, any name is okay (and the common ones definitely have more than one sentence). So it would really be only about displaying tags who are currently in use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: