Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: async versions of functions? #145

Open
eykd opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Feature Request: async versions of functions? #145

eykd opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@eykd
Copy link

eykd commented Dec 21, 2023

Is there any interest in adding async versions of the functions here? This is such a useful toolkit in sync land, but the divide between iterators and async iterators is deep.

Between aiostream and asyncstdlib I can cobble together most of what I need, but the naming is subtly different from my go-to funcy, and the libraries use different conventions (e.g. aiostream.stream.skip(myiter, 5) vs. funcy.drop(5, myiter).

@Suor
Copy link
Owner

Suor commented Jan 18, 2024

I've seen a couple of incomplete async helper libraries too, the thing is I don't write async python that much so might be not a good candidate to author such a library.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants