Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs]: resource snowflake_failover_group undocumented options for allowed_integration_types #2516

Open
gdelia-pm opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
category:resource resource:failover_group Issue connected to the snowflake_failover_group resource

Comments

@gdelia-pm
Copy link

Documentation Link

https://registry.terraform.io/providers/Snowflake-Labs/snowflake/latest/docs/resources/failover_group

Description

allowed_integration_trypes notes Security and API as supported options, but storage should be here as well.

References

allowed_integration_types (Set of String) Type(s) of integrations for which you are enabling replication and failover from the source account to the target account. This property requires that the OBJECT_TYPES list include INTEGRATIONS to set this parameter. The following integration types are supported: "SECURITY INTEGRATIONS", "API INTEGRATIONS"

Would you like to implement a fix?

None

@sfc-gh-asawicki
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @gdelia-pm. Thanks for the suggestion.

We will be improving existing GA resources soon. We will be adding missing functionalities and improving the docs too. I will make sure we address it then. You can check our roadmap here: https://github.com/Snowflake-Labs/terraform-provider-snowflake/blob/main/ROADMAP.md#our-roadmap.

@sfc-gh-jcieslak sfc-gh-jcieslak added resource:failover_group Issue connected to the snowflake_failover_group resource category:resource labels May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:resource resource:failover_group Issue connected to the snowflake_failover_group resource
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants