You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2024. It is now read-only.
Describe the bug
When setting the prop RPM and Torque to various values at cruise stated by the POH, they don't seem to match very well.
Example:
Figure 1
Figure 2
As seen in figure 1, I am cruising at 8000 feet with RPM set to 1750 and torque set to 1843. According to the POH (figure 2) I should achieve 171 KTAS at 396 PPH, but instead, I observe 166 KATS at 440. While they are not THAT far off, I have observed fairly large deviations of more than 10 kts and more than 50 ppm from POH, especially when cruising at 1900 RPM.
Wonderful mod you have here, just wanted to point out something i noticed :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems that you are looking at the table for the 208B non-EX, with a lower engine configuration (675 shp / 3 blade), while the aircraft in question is the 208B EX (867 shp / 4 blade). Could you please confirm by testing the table below?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Describe the bug
When setting the prop RPM and Torque to various values at cruise stated by the POH, they don't seem to match very well.
Example:
Figure 1
Figure 2
As seen in figure 1, I am cruising at 8000 feet with RPM set to 1750 and torque set to 1843. According to the POH (figure 2) I should achieve 171 KTAS at 396 PPH, but instead, I observe 166 KATS at 440. While they are not THAT far off, I have observed fairly large deviations of more than 10 kts and more than 50 ppm from POH, especially when cruising at 1900 RPM.
Wonderful mod you have here, just wanted to point out something i noticed :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: