We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
您好,关于您论文中提到的AvgAttention和AvgGradient对比方法我有一些疑问。以AvgAttention为例,假如以一个文本单元内所有词的Attention权重的均值作为这个文本单元的得分,那么这个得分就不会大于该文本单元内部Attention权重最高的词的权重值,那么选择得分最高的文本单元不是等价于选择Attention权重最高的单词吗,这样的话,抽取出来的文本单元应该都是单个词,而不会有词组的形式。可是后面的实验部分这两个对比方法都抽取出了词组的形式,这是不是就矛盾了。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
您好,关于您论文中提到的AvgAttention和AvgGradient对比方法我有一些疑问。以AvgAttention为例,假如以一个文本单元内所有词的Attention权重的均值作为这个文本单元的得分,那么这个得分就不会大于该文本单元内部Attention权重最高的词的权重值,那么选择得分最高的文本单元不是等价于选择Attention权重最高的单词吗,这样的话,抽取出来的文本单元应该都是单个词,而不会有词组的形式。可是后面的实验部分这两个对比方法都抽取出了词组的形式,这是不是就矛盾了。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: