Make slime more accessible

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Would be nice to have instructions or whatever else is needed to make it
easy for people to use the slime checks. This would also make it more
likely that we would get new rules contributed back.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 4 Oct 2008 at 10:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

+1

The question I have is whether Slime also works with the Refactoring Engine that
comes with tools or only with the tool less Refactoring Engine core. If so
instructions for loading OmniBrowser would also help. I also find the 
integration
into OmniBrowser quite unintuitive.

In the longer term better integration of Seaside into OmniBrowser would be 
cool. For
example a 'register as application' entry on the context menu of a class.

Original comment by [email protected] on 4 Oct 2008 at 10:26

• Added labels: Platform-Squeak
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Slime should be backward compatible. It just extends the existing rule-engine 
with a few more methods. It 
shouldn't matter if you use OmniBrowser or the old Morphic UI.

Documentation can be found here:

    http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-rb-1
    http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-rb-2
    http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-rb-3

If you find it unintuitive please go ahead and fix it. For my own purpose I 
find it absolutely perfect.

I agree that an Seaside-OmniBrowser toolkit would be cool.

Original comment by renggli on 5 Oct 2008 at 6:50

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Linked it on the web page:
http://www.seaside.st/documentation/tools

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Oct 2008 at 10:08

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

But none of this specifically mentions the seaside-specific rules, does it?

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Oct 2008 at 10:36

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/slime

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Oct 2008 at 10:56

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Ok... getting better. Now can we include this in the Universe and in the 
one-click
image? :)

I'd just like people to be likely to end up having it and using it.

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Oct 2008 at 12:15

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It is in the one-click image.

Original comment by renggli on 5 Oct 2008 at 2:29

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The RB doesn't allow to add new categories for rules. Adding a category would 
mean to change the core 
implementation of the RB.

Original comment by renggli on 5 Oct 2008 at 9:45

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I worked on this one. Slime is now part of Seaside and has its rules have their 
own category. Load the latest 
Refactory-Core and Seaside-Slime and Seaside-Tests-Slime. Seaside-Slime and 
Seaside-Tests-Slime are now 
part of the Seaside repository.

Accessibility can be further improved, but marked as fixed for now.

Original comment by renggli on 18 Oct 2008 at 7:24

• Changed state: Fixed
• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****