Parameter estimation #1099
Parameter estimation #1099
Conversation
|
I'm pretty sure this one needs updates to the callback syntax? Are you running these and making sure they are working? You keep telling me to review PRs that are not actually done and it's a big waste of time. |
|
Yes @ChrisRackauckas , This still needs updates. Sorry if this annoys you but actually for some reason I am not able to run the Julia codes locally because somethings have messed up. I am trying to figure that out so I can run them locally. For now, whenever I am solving an issue I make a pull request and try to run it on the CI and see what comes |
|
If the error says something I have already dealt with then I try to solve it by myself. If there's something I am finding hard to figure , I ask you to review because I know you can help me out. Nothing else |
|
Sorry if this wasted your time and effort I can understand that. I will fix things so that everything runs well locally and I am able to run it locally so this doesn't happen again. Sorry again. |
|
My system is now able to handle Julia well. I can perform all the tests now |
|
How to deal with this one ?? Is it actually a bug here ?? |
|
I don't know, that would take some time to dive in, but I assume the majority of fixing this benchmark is likely figuring that one out. |
|
This is mixing dynamical and parameter estimation. Closing because this doesn't have any real changes in it. @ParamThakkar123 I'm going to recommend this project as a SciML Small Grant for someone else since there has been no progress made on it. |
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.