-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revive docs #848
Revive docs #848
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ErikQQY <[email protected]>
It's so weird, the CI log doesn't show any useful information about the errors. I checked the commit history and found that PR #819 broke the documentation, there was an error about the code in the new docs: using Flux, Tracker
x = [0.8; 0.8]
ann = Chain(Dense(2, 10, tanh), Dense(10, 1))
p, re = Flux.destructure(ann)
z = re(Float64(p)) error: ERROR: MethodError: no method matching Float64(::Vector{Float32})
Closest candidates are:
(::Type{T})(::AbstractChar) where T<:Union{AbstractChar, Number}
@ Base char.jl:50
(::Type{T})(::Base.TwicePrecision) where T<:Number
@ Base twiceprecision.jl:266
(::Type{T})(::Flux.NilNumber.Nil) where T<:Number
@ Flux D:\Julia\.julia\packages\Flux\n3cOc\src\outputsize.jl:18
... |
That code isn't ran though, so it can't be the issue? |
Yeah, the CI still failed. Maybe we can try reverting PR #819? |
@avik-pal looks like a display error in Lux? https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqFlux.jl/actions/runs/5705070398/job/15459319933?pr=848 . I made it so it won't display. Let's see if that fixes the docs. |
I think this PR could revive the documentation
JuliaCon hackathon yeah!!🥳
Fixes #846