Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement basic OnyxDatePicker component #2145

Open
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

larsrickert
Copy link
Collaborator

@larsrickert larsrickert commented Nov 25, 2024

Relates to #1818

Implement a basic date picker comonent.

Checklist

  • The added / edited code has been documented with JSDoc
  • If a new component is added, at least one Playwright screenshot test is added
  • A changeset is added with npx changeset add if your changes should be released as npm package (because they affect the library usage)

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 25, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d2e9e32

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
Name Type
sit-onyx Minor
demo-app Patch
playground Patch
@sit-onyx/chartjs-plugin Major
@sit-onyx/nuxt Major
@sit-onyx/vitepress-theme Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@larsrickert larsrickert changed the title [DRAFT: implement basic OnyxDatePicker component implement basic OnyxDatePicker component Nov 26, 2024
@larsrickert larsrickert marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 10:44
@larsrickert larsrickert requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2024 10:44
@larsrickert larsrickert changed the title implement basic OnyxDatePicker component feat: implement basic OnyxDatePicker component Nov 26, 2024
<input
:id="inputId"
:key="props.type"
v-model="value"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a particular reason why we don't use valueAsDate? Then we don't need to do the conversion magic ourselves 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants