Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SMT/RMT registration #605

Open
pirat013 opened this issue Nov 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

SMT/RMT registration #605

pirat013 opened this issue Nov 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pirat013
Copy link
Contributor

at line 7 the # Autogenerated addresses example based in 19.168.135.0/24 -> I guess it should be 192.168.135.0/24

Do we have somewhere an example for an SMT/RMT server registration?

@pirat013
Copy link
Contributor Author

pirat013 commented Nov 25, 2020

The procedure could be like this for SLES15 SP2 and an SMT with self signed certificate:

wget https://<FQHN>/<name-of-crt>.crt --no-check-certificate
cp <name-of-crt>.crt /etc/pki/trust/anchors/registration_server.pem
update-ca-certificates
SUSEConnect --url https://<FQHN>

that means we need two more variables:
FQHN = "https://smtserver.customer.com"
name-of-crt = "smt"

@arbulu89 arbulu89 added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Dec 1, 2020
@arbulu89
Copy link
Collaborator

arbulu89 commented Dec 1, 2020

Thanks @pirat013 ,
Yes, the first one is a typo. Thank you for the report.

About the 2nd:
As you say, we would need some new implementation, we never had the need to do so, but if it makes sense, we can include it.

We would add it as optional. If the user doesn't provide any of those parameters, we would use the standard url, and the provided ones otherwise.

Would this be good enough?

@yeoldegrove yeoldegrove changed the title libvirt main.tf typos SMT/RMT registration May 12, 2022
@yeoldegrove yeoldegrove removed the bug Something isn't working label May 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants