You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to know what the preferred way is to convolute the seismogram with the source time functions. The manual suggests using the Seismic Analysis Code (SAC) software for the task, but I am having difficulties reading the output file in SAC.
Thanks in advance for suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess you meant "convolve", not "convolute" the seismograms - this might have different meanings :)
in general, the convolution step is part of your post-processing. thus, it depends on how you do your preferred post-processing. this could be with python scripts, perl scripts, bash scripts and/or together with SAC or obspy etc.
the SPECFEM3D package only provides a very simple convolution post-processing tool bin/xconvolve_source_timefunction when compiled. simple in the sense of only convolving "smooth triangle" functions (Gaussians with a decay such that they are similar to triangular functions).
regarding SAC, it should be able to read in the ASCII trace outputs using a command like
read alpha <tracefile>
for the rest of the procedure follow the SAC manual.
and other convolution possibilities can be found online using obspy or numpy for python scripts.
and hopefully other users following this discussion can provide you with more specific script examples on how to convolve your traces with arbitrary source time functions.
I would like to know what the preferred way is to convolute the seismogram with the source time functions. The manual suggests using the Seismic Analysis Code (SAC) software for the task, but I am having difficulties reading the output file in SAC.
Thanks in advance for suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: