You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are using DLRS within our trigger framework (fflib). Each SObjectDomain class derives from a common base class and the common base class invokes DLRS. Our triggers are named to correspond to our SObjectDomain class and therefore do not conform to the naming convention that DLRS expects in order to allow activation of a rollup.
Enhancement: Enable support to allow activation of rollups without enforcing the trigger name check while still supporting backwards compat with previous library pattern.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are using DLRS within our trigger framework (fflib). Each SObjectDomain class derives from a common base class and the common base class invokes DLRS. Our triggers are named to correspond to our SObjectDomain class and therefore do not conform to the naming convention that DLRS expects in order to allow activation of a rollup.
Enhancement: Enable support to allow activation of rollups without enforcing the trigger name check while still supporting backwards compat with previous library pattern.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: