You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm testing the transformation to geodcat ap for the 3.0.0 pilot.
With the sample iso records i'm working with (valid records from the dutch NGR) CatalogRecord, Distribution and Dataservice result in blank node statements in the rdf output.
While technically probably correct, a lot of tooling can't handle blank nodes easily so the connection between the Dataset and it's Dataservice, Distribution and CatalogRecord is lost.
I think it would be beneficial to explicitly serialize the dcat:distibution, dcat:servesDataset and dcat:dataset properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
NielsHoffmann
changed the title
blank nodes for distribution and dataservice and catalogrecord
blank nodes for distribution, dataservice and catalogrecord
Oct 14, 2024
I'm testing the transformation to geodcat ap for the 3.0.0 pilot.
With the sample iso records i'm working with (valid records from the dutch NGR) CatalogRecord, Distribution and Dataservice result in blank node statements in the rdf output.
While technically probably correct, a lot of tooling can't handle blank nodes easily so the connection between the Dataset and it's Dataservice, Distribution and CatalogRecord is lost.
I think it would be beneficial to explicitly serialize the dcat:distibution, dcat:servesDataset and dcat:dataset properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: