-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
catalog format for time-only forecasts #112
Comments
Is the forecast specified as a catalog? also, how will you define the region to filter the catalog used for the evaluation? in short, yes, you can just create dummy locations for lat/lon/depth in the forecast. by doing this, you will only be able to compute the number_test(). the other option is to create a mock class that would work with the number_test and magnitude_test() functions. this requires a bit more understanding of python. this is probably the best solution to be honest. i haven't anticipated this use-case yet, so ill work through an example to show how this would work. it might require some code changes. |
the actual output is just number of events in time, so the first option would require a sort of wrapper/post-processing to create an ad-hoc catalog with dummy locations. |
id be in support of having the ability to accommodate a temporal only forecast. if you don't mind sharing an example output of the forecast in ascii format i could try and help you set up the class to make sure it works with everything else. |
hi @rinaldiap, just checking in to see if you had any luck working with time-only forecasts. |
not really. I had no much time, but I will provide an example soon |
How should I format my catalog if I want to compare only the time evolution of my forecast?
Should I just use a fake location for "each" event?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: